Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant's claim for concession under Notification No. 179/80 could be rejected without examining the annexure to the certificate issued by the concerned authority, which contained the individual items and their respective headings.
Analysis: The impugned order showed that the lower authority had looked only at the covering letter of the certificate and had not considered the annexure setting out the individual items and the headings under which they fell. Since eligibility for the concession depended on a proper examination of that material, the authority's approach was treated as an error. The annexure required verification before a conclusion on the prayer for concession could be reached.
Conclusion: The matter was remanded to the original authority for fresh consideration of the appellant's claim after examining the annexure and after granting an opportunity of personal hearing and of producing additional evidence.
Final Conclusion: The appeals succeeded to the extent that the denial of concession was set aside and the dispute was sent back for reconsideration on the relevant evidence.
Ratio Decidendi: A claim to fiscal concession cannot be decided by relying only on a covering letter when the accompanying annexure contains material particulars necessary to determine eligibility; the authority must examine the complete certificate evidence before refusing the benefit.