Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether cement and steel structurals used for erecting a blast furnace could be treated as capital goods under Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, so as to justify reference of a question of law under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944.
Analysis: The definition of capital goods under Rule 57Q covers machine, machinery, plant, equipment and similar items used for producing or processing goods or for bringing about a change in the manufacture of the final product. A blast furnace may itself be regarded as machinery used in production, but materials used to erect it are part of the process of bringing the furnace into existence and are anterior to its use in manufacture. On that basis, the Tribunal found no infirmity in the view that such construction materials do not qualify as capital goods, and no legal question warranting reference to the High Court arose.
Conclusion: The reference application was rejected.