Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported adhesive goods were consumer goods liable to confiscation for import without licence, or industrial raw materials covered by the Import Policy 1992-97.
Analysis: The goods were used by the respondents in machines for binding hard-bound and perfect-bound books. The product literature and operating manuals showed that the goods were applied through machinery, involved high-temperature use, and were meant for gluing and case sealing in the manufacturing process. Under Para 7(34) of the Import Policy 1992-97, raw material includes materials required for a manufacturer's process, whether previously manufactured or processed. The imported goods therefore answered the description of raw material and not consumer goods directly satisfying human needs.
Conclusion: The goods were not consumer goods and were not liable to confiscation under Section 111(d) of the Customs Act, 1962; the appeal failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Goods used as inputs in a manufacturing process, even if ready for application through machines, are raw material and not consumer goods if they do not directly satisfy human needs.