Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Beta Naphthol Tar and Bon Acid Tar, arising in the course of manufacture of Beta Naphthol and Bon Acid, were excisable goods classifiable under Tariff Item 68 or were merely waste and scrap not liable to excise duty.
Analysis: The disputed materials were found to have a separate identity and distinct physical and chemical characteristics. They were commercially known as Beta Naphthol Tar and Bon Acid Tar, and the record showed regular sales over a substantial period, establishing that they were marketable commodities and not stray disposals of useless residue. The assessee's own reply described the products as Beta Naphthol Tar and Bon Acid Tar, reinforcing their identity in trade. The fact that they arose as by-products or were described as waste from the manufacturer's perspective did not negate excisability once they had acquired the character of distinct goods with commercial value.
Conclusion: The products were held to be excisable goods falling under Tariff Item 68 of the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff, and the duty demand was sustained. The finding was in favour of Revenue.
Ratio Decidendi: A substance emerging in the course of manufacture is excisable if it has acquired separate identity, is known in the market as a distinct commodity, and is regularly bought and sold for commercial value, regardless of whether it is described as a by-product or waste.