TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal Upholds Revenue's Classification of 'Torsion Shaft' under Central Excise Tariff</h1> <h3>LARSEN & TOUBRO LTD. Versus COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, BOMBAY</h3> LARSEN & TOUBRO LTD. Versus COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, BOMBAY - 1998 (98) E.L.T. 861 (Tribunal) Issues: Classification of 'Torsion Shaft' under Central Excise Tariff, 1985Detailed Analysis:1. Classification Dispute: The appellants contested the classification of the product 'Torsion Shaft' for membrane coupling under sub-heading No. 8483.00 of the Central Excise Tariff, 1985, while they claimed it should be classified under sub-heading No. 8479.00 of the same Tariff.2. Appellants' Argument: The appellants argued that the 'Torsion Shaft' is an integral part of Rotary Kiln specifically designed for cement plants, aiming to avoid misalignment between the gear box and pinion. They emphasized that the shaft does not transmit or generate power by itself and is solely suitable for use with cement machinery, relying on a certificate from M/s. Shanti Consulting Engineers and a previous Tribunal decision in a similar case.3. Revenue's Position: The Revenue classified the 'Torsion Shaft' under sub-heading No. 8483.00, considering its function to transmit rotary motive power based on the diagram submitted by the appellants. They referred to definitions of 'torsion' and 'shaft' from technical dictionaries to support their classification.4. Legal Interpretation: The Tribunal analyzed the definitions of 'torsion' and 'shaft' from technical dictionaries to determine the nature and function of the 'Torsion Shaft.' They referred to Section Note 2 of Section XVI of the Central Excise Tariff, 1985, which governs the classification of parts of machines, stating that parts falling under Chapter 84 or Chapter 85 are to be classified according to specific rules.5. Decision: The Tribunal concluded that the 'Torsion Shaft' is rightly classifiable under sub-heading No. 8483.00 of the Central Excise Tariff, 1985, based on the interpretation of Section Note 2(a) of Section XVI. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed, ruling in favor of the Revenue's classification.In summary, the judgment resolved the classification dispute by interpreting technical definitions and relevant tariff provisions to determine the appropriate classification of the 'Torsion Shaft' under the Central Excise Tariff, 1985, ultimately upholding the Revenue's classification under sub-heading No. 8483.00.
TaxTMI 