Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the communications dated 21-2-1990 and 27-12-1990 asking reversal of Modvat credit constituted a notice to show cause under Rule 57-I of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, and whether the second proposed question raised a question of law.
Analysis: Rule 57-I specifically contemplates service of a show cause notice before recovery of wrongly taken Modvat credit and requires an opportunity to the assessee before a decision is taken. The communications in question set out the grounds on which reversal of credit was demanded and, on that basis, could be treated as notice in law. The proposed second question concerned only factual appreciation and did not raise an independent question of law.
Conclusion: The first question was held to be a fit question of law for reference, while the second was rejected as a mere question of fact.