Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessable value of the imported used sonograph was correctly determined on the basis of the price of a new comparable machine after allowing depreciation.
Analysis: In the case of used and second-hand machinery, a direct price list of the exact machine is often unavailable, and valuation must be made on a reasonable basis having regard to the condition of the machine at the time of import and other relevant evidence. The machine was shown to have been purchased in 1984, and the Department relied on the price list of a similar scanner at US $ 18,700, thereafter granting depreciation for years of use and arriving at Rs. 1,38,000/-. The contention that the model was not identical was not accepted, because valuation of second-hand machinery necessarily proceeds on a practical comparison and exact identity is seldom available.
Conclusion: The assessable value fixed by the Department was upheld and the challenge to valuation failed.
Final Conclusion: The appeal did not succeed, and the departmental valuation of the imported used equipment stood affirmed.
Ratio Decidendi: Valuation of used and second-hand machinery may be based on a reasonable comparable price with appropriate depreciation where no exact market price for the identical machine is available.