1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Customs Tribunal Upheld in Ball Bearings Undervaluation Dispute</h1> The appeal was dismissed by the court, upholding the Customs, Excise, and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal's decision regarding alleged undervaluation of ... Valuation (Customs) - Under-valuation Issues: Appeal against order of Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal regarding alleged undervaluation of imported ball bearings.Summary:1. Undervaluation Allegation: Respondents imported ball bearings from Hungary, facing allegations of gross undervaluation based on complaints. Show cause notices proposed enhancing values, which respondents contested, claiming no undervaluation. Collector of Customs initially accepted invoice prices as correct. Appeals filed with CEGAT, which upheld the invoice prices as correct, dismissing the appeals. Respondents submitted embassy certificates to support invoice prices as latest in the country of origin. 2. Legal Contention: Appellant's counsel argued CEGAT's observation on assessable value under Section 14 was unjustified, claiming no obligation for the department to provide evidence of contemporaneous imports at higher prices to prove undervaluation. CEGAT's judgment was reviewed, clarifying that the observation was specific to the case at hand, emphasizing the need for evidence if disputes arise despite importer's submission of correct invoice prices. No general legal proposition was established by CEGAT. As CEGAT's decision was deemed correct, the appeals were dismissed.