Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported gear shape cutters and hob cutters were permissible goods for import under the actual user condition and whether confiscation could be sustained.
Analysis: The import licence covered Appendix 3 items subject to actual user condition, and the controversy turned on whether the cutters were confined to gear manufacturers or could also be used in the wire netting industry. The importer produced an independent engineer's certificate and supporting material showing that the items were used for making dies and fixtures for manufacture of wire netting, industrial filters, sieves and perforated sheets. That evidence was not met by any contrary expert opinion or rebuttal material. The reasoning also accepted that the technical description of gear cutting and hob cutting was not limited to gear manufacture alone, but extended to operations on workpieces requiring tooth-like projections or evenly spaced forms.
Conclusion: The import was held to be covered by the licence and the confiscation order could not be sustained. The appeal was allowed with consequential relief.
Final Conclusion: The importer succeeded in establishing permissible end-use of the goods, and the adverse customs order was set aside.