Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether waiver of pre-deposit under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 should be granted in full or in part, and whether the assessable value for the disputed duty demand had to be recalculated by treating the cash discount component as cum duty price and deducting the duty element under Section 4(4)(d)(ii) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.
Analysis: The appellant sought waiver of pre-deposit in respect of only a part of the confirmed demand, contending that the duty demand had been quantified without first excluding the duty component from the gross amount relatable to the cash discount. The respondent did not dispute that Section 4(4)(d)(ii) had to be taken into account for arriving at the assessable value. On a prima facie view, the quantification of assessable value and consequential differential duty appeared erroneous to the extent that the duty element had not been excluded. The request to permit payment out of available Modvat credit was also considered.
Outcome: The requirement of pre-deposit was waived to the extent of Rs. 10,18,187/- and the penalty amount, and the appellant was directed to pay Rs. 21,38,234/- out of valid Modvat credit or otherwise deposit the amount within the stipulated time.