Deemed Modvat credit can continue beyond the small-scale limit, but credit needs linkage to the duty-paying invoice or challan.

Deemed Modvat credit for re-rolling mills under Notification No. 1/93 was treated as continuing even after the aggregate value crossed the Rs. 75 lakh limit, following the Tribunal's earlier consistent view on the exemption. By contrast, a depot cash memo was held insufficient for Modvat credit under Rule 57G where it did not link the supply to the underlying invoice or challan evidencing duty payment. The material principle was that exemption-linked deemed credit could survive the small-scale limit, but credit documentation still had to establish proper connection with the duty-paying document. Penalties consequential to the accepted claim were set aside.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether a re-rolling mill enjoying exemption under Notification No. 1/93 remained entitled to deemed Modvat credit after crossing the aggregate value limit of Rs. 75 lakh; (ii) Whether a cash memo issued by a depot, without reference to the underlying invoice or challan, was sufficient for availing Modvat credit.

Issue (i): Whether a re-rolling mill enjoying exemption under Notification No. 1/93 remained entitled to deemed Modvat credit after crossing the aggregate value limit of Rs. 75 lakh.

Analysis: The Tribunal followed its earlier consistent view that deemed Modvat credit was admissible to re-rolling mills even after the aggregate value crossed Rs. 75 lakh. The earlier decisions treated the benefit as continuing notwithstanding the crossing of the small-scale limit, and no reason was found to depart from that precedent.

Conclusion: The issue was decided in favour of the assessee, and deemed Modvat credit was held admissible even beyond the Rs. 75 lakh limit.

Issue (ii): Whether a cash memo issued by a depot, without reference to the underlying invoice or challan, was sufficient for availing Modvat credit.

Analysis: Although the cash memo indicated the rate and amount of duty, it did not contain any reference to the invoice or challan through which duty had been paid. In the absence of such linkage to the duty-paying document, the cash memo was held insufficient for Modvat credit under Rule 57G of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.

Conclusion: The issue was decided against the assessee, and denial of Modvat credit of Rs. 11,791 was upheld.

Final Conclusion: The appeals were disposed of by granting the substantive Modvat benefit on the first issue, upholding the denial of credit on the second issue, and setting aside the penalties that were consequential to the accepted claim.

Ratio Decidendi: Deemed Modvat credit could not be denied merely because the unit had crossed the small-scale aggregate value limit, but Modvat credit under Rule 57G required proper linkage to the underlying duty-paying invoice or challan.

---