Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit on capital goods could be taken and utilised before the capital goods were actually installed in a factory that was already in existence.
Analysis: The dispute turned on the construction of the Modvat provisions relating to capital goods. The departmental view was that the expression referring to capital goods used by the manufacturer in the factory required actual installation before credit could be utilised. The Tribunal noted that credit was permissible on receipt of the goods with duty-paid documents, that the scheme did not create an embargo on utilisation until installation, and that the same Modvat framework under the inputs provisions had never been treated as requiring actual prior use before credit utilisation. It was also noted that the factory was already operational, and the Board circular clarified that, for existing plants, credit on capital goods received into the factory could be utilised immediately, with the earlier contrary understanding having been modified by the later circular.
Conclusion: Modvat credit on capital goods could be taken and utilised before installation in the case of an existing factory manufacturing and clearing the final product. The demand and penalty were unsustainable.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the relevant Modvat scheme permits credit on receipt of capital goods and the factory is already operational, credit need not await actual installation of the capital goods unless the rules expressly impose such a restriction.