Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit was admissible on insulated cable scrap taken as a composite input, notwithstanding that the PVC insulation portion was burnt away in the manufacturing process and did not itself form part of the final product.
Analysis: The declared input was waste and scrap of insulated cable and not aluminium scrap alone. The credit had been taken on the duty paid on the composite scrap as received, and the PVC portion had no separate identity in the input. Rule 57A permits credit on inputs used in or in relation to the manufacture of final products, and Rule 57D(1) bars denial or variation of credit merely because part of the input becomes waste, refuse, or by-product in the course of manufacture. The process of melting the cable scrap to remove the insulation was treated as part of a continuous manufacturing operation, not as a separate activity warranting compartmentalisation of the input for credit purposes.
Conclusion: Modvat credit was admissible on the entire quantity of insulated cable waste and scrap, and denial of credit on the ground that the PVC portion was not itself used in the final product was unsustainable.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a composite input is received and duty is paid on that input as such, credit cannot be restricted by segregating a non-usable constituent that becomes waste in the course of a continuous manufacturing process; Rule 57D protects the full credit.