Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether MODVAT credit on Oleum was admissible in full when only part of the input was consumed in manufacture and the balance emerged as spent acid.
Analysis: The MODVAT scheme under Rule 57A allowed credit on notified inputs used in or in relation to the manufacture of notified final products, upon the prescribed declaration under Rule 57G. The Rules did not require credit to be restricted only to the portion of input actually consumed, nor did they require declaration of exact consumption percentage. Rule 57F dealt with utilisation of credit and also provided for treatment of inputs cleared from the factory or of waste arising from processing, but it did not require reversal of credit merely because part of the input emerged as spent acid. The scheme contemplated a credit pool and did not prescribe one-to-one correlation between input and output.
Conclusion: MODVAT credit was correctly taken on the entire input, and the demand raised by restricting credit to 49% was not sustainable.
Ratio Decidendi: Where notified inputs are validly taken into MODVAT credit and used in or in relation to manufacture, the credit is not confined to the exact quantity physically consumed, and no reversal is required merely because part of the input emerges as by-product or waste.