TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Appellants cleared complete cranes, not parts, leading to duty evasion allegation dismissal.</h1> <h3>SHRIKE CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENTS PVT. LTD. Versus CCE., PUNE</h3> SHRIKE CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENTS PVT. LTD. Versus CCE., PUNE - 1997 (95) E.L.T. 644 (Tribunal) Issues Involved: Determination of whether the appellant cleared cranes or parts of cranes and the appropriate duty rate applied.Summary:The appellants, engaged in manufacturing Tower Cranes and EOT cranes, were alleged to have cleared parts of cranes by misrepresenting them as complete cranes, leading to duty evasion. The appellants contended that cranes are bulky machines requiring assembly at the site, and contracts were for design, manufacture, and installation at the site only. They supplied cranes to various entities and provided detailed documentation to support their claim.The Revenue argued that the appellants accounted for the goods as parts of cranes in their records, and therefore, duty should be levied accordingly. However, the appellants presented evidence showing orders for complete cranes, filing of price lists, and clearance of cranes under gate passes, indicating the supply of complete cranes and not just parts.After considering the arguments and evidence presented, it was concluded that the appellants indeed cleared complete cranes during the relevant period and not just parts. As a result, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed.
TaxTMI 