Clubbing of Clearances Requires Proof of Financial Interdependence and Managerial Control, Not Mere Shared Facilities

Clubbing of clearances on a shadow-unit theory requires substantive proof of financial interdependence and pervasive managerial control. Common facilities such as a shared diesel generating set, or the mere absence of a revised ground plan, were held insufficient on their own. Additional allegations raised later could not be relied upon because they had not been put to notice. The record also showed that the second unit had informed the department of its existence, which weakened the claim of clandestine unity. In the absence of evidence of free financial flow and total administrative control, the units retained separate identity and the duty demand was not sustainable.

---

---

Issues: Whether the clearances of two units could be clubbed on the allegation that the later unit was a shadow unit of the earlier unit, and whether the demand and penalty could be sustained on the material relied upon.

Analysis: The show cause notice rested essentially on two grounds: non-amendment of the ground plan and shared use of a diesel generating set. The department sought to rely on additional allegations in the appeal, but those facts had not been put to notice and could not be used to sustain the case. The record showed that the second unit had informed the department of its existence, weakening the claim of clandestine unity. Mere sharing of electricity, by itself, was insufficient to establish that the two units were one. For clubbing clearances, the department had to establish substantive evidence of free financial interflow and total administrative control of one unit over the other, and no such evidence was produced.

Conclusion: The allegation of unity between the two units was not proved, the clearances could not be clubbed, and the demand was not sustainable. The appeal by the Revenue failed.

Final Conclusion: Separate legal identity of the two units was upheld, and the Revenue's challenge to the denial of duty demand did not succeed.

Ratio Decidendi: Clubbing of clearances on the basis of a shadow-unit allegation requires substantive evidence of financial interdependence and pervasive managerial control, not merely common facilities or unpleaded assertions.

---