Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the respondent was liable to pay central excise duty on polyethylene films in view of Notification No. 208/84 issued under Section 11C of the Central Excise Act, 1944.
Analysis: Notification No. 208/84 covered polyethylene films of all sorts of thickness not exceeding 0.25 mm falling under Tariff Item 15A of the First Schedule. The notification was not confined to films of rigid variety. As there was no material to show that the respondent's films exceeded the prescribed thickness, the exemption applied and duty was not payable. In view of this conclusion, the question of limitation did not require consideration.
Conclusion: The respondent was entitled to the benefit of the exemption notification and was not liable to pay the duty demanded.
Final Conclusion: The appeal failed and the order relieving the respondent from the duty demand was sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an exemption notification covers goods of a specified description without restricting the benefit to a narrower variety, the burdened duty demand cannot be sustained unless the department shows that the goods fall outside the notified coverage.