Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether zinc dross with high zinc content was classifiable as residue under Chapter Heading 26.02 or as waste and scrap under Tariff Heading 79.01.
Analysis: Chapter 26 covers metal ores, slag, ash and residue, and the residue contemplated thereunder is of a kind emerging from the processing of ores or concentrates with relatively lower metallic concentration. The goods in question were not obtained from ore processing but arose in the electrolytic galvanising process. The Tribunal also treated the relied-upon non-ferrous scrap classification material as supporting the characterisation of the goods as scrap rather than residue. On that basis, the goods were not brought within Chapter Heading 26.02.
Conclusion: The goods were correctly classified under Tariff Heading 79.01 and the assessee's claim under Chapter Heading 26.02 was rejected.