Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether silk tops and silk noils were classifiable under Heading 5001 or under Heading 5601 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985.
Analysis: The disputed goods were found to have a length of about 45 mm to 60 mm, whereas Heading 5601 covered textile fibres not exceeding 5 mm in length and related wadding-type material. The goods were therefore outside the scope of Heading 5601. The Harmonised System of Nomenclature notes were also relied upon, which treated silk noils as residue from combing and indicated that such goods remained under the silk heading so long as they had not reached the stage of spun yarn. In the absence of a specific entry elsewhere, the goods were held to fit Heading 5001.
Conclusion: The goods were correctly classifiable under Heading 5001 and not under Heading 5601; the departmental appeal failed.