UPS classification conflict under Heading 8504 required Larger Bench reference to resolve inconsistent Tribunal views.

Uninterruptible power supply systems were discussed as classifiable under Heading 8504 because the technical material described them as rectifier-chargers, inverters and static transfer switches, and the HSN Notes covered static convertors and stabilized supplies with auxiliary devices unless specifically designed as Heading 8471 units. The article also notes that mere use with computers does not by itself move the goods out of Heading 8504, while an earlier Tribunal view had placed similar goods under Heading 8543. Because conflicting coordinate-Bench decisions existed, the matter was required to be referred to a Larger Bench for reconciliation and no final tariff classification was settled.

---

---

Issues: Whether uninterruptible power supply system should be referred for consideration by a Larger Bench in view of conflicting classification views under CTH 8504 and CTH 8543.

Analysis: The catalogue and technical description showed that the equipment functioned as a rectifier-charger, inverter and static transfer switch, and the HSN Notes for Heading 8504 specifically covered static convertors and even stabilized supplies combined with auxiliary devices unless specifically designed as a unit of Heading 8471. The material relied on also showed that the goods were not merely computer parts and that mere capability of use with computers did not take them out of Heading 8504. At the same time, an earlier Tribunal view had classified similar goods under Heading 8543, creating a conflicting coordinate-Bench position. The Board circular and the World Customs Organisation opinion were treated as supporting the 8504 classification, but the conflict in existing Tribunal decisions required resolution by a larger forum.

Conclusion: The matter was required to be placed before the President for reference to a Larger Bench to reconcile the conflicting views on classification.

Final Conclusion: No final classification was finally settled by this order, and the controversy was directed to be resolved by a Larger Bench.

Ratio Decidendi: Where conflicting coordinate-Bench decisions exist on tariff classification, and the issue remains unresolved at the same level, reference to a Larger Bench is appropriate for authoritative reconciliation.

---