Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, pending the final decision on the tariff classification of Uninterrupted Power Supply System, the petitioner should be directed to pay excise duty treating the product as falling under Heading 85.04 and furnish an undertaking to abide by the ultimate decision.
Analysis: The classification dispute was already under consideration before the Supreme Court and was also linked to reconsideration by the CEGAT. In the meantime, the existing departmental circular and the then prevailing position on classification were noted, along with the competing view expressed in the impugned circular. In these circumstances, an interim arrangement was considered appropriate so that duty liability would continue to be discharged on the basis of Heading 85.04, coupled with an undertaking to comply with the final decision when rendered.
Conclusion: The petitioner was directed to pay excise duty treating UPS as classifiable under Heading 85.04 until further orders and to file the requisite undertaking to abide by the final decision.