TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether Modvat credit on inputs contained in waste arising during manufacture of BOPP film is admissible under Rule 57D irrespective of the quantum of waste. (ii) Whether the questions proposed in the reference application arose out of the impugned order.
Issue (i): Whether Modvat credit on inputs contained in waste arising during manufacture of BOPP film is admissible under Rule 57D irrespective of the quantum of waste.
Analysis: The Tribunal applied Rule 57D on the footing that credit on inputs is not to be denied or varied merely because part of the inputs is contained in waste, refuse or by-product. The earlier view relied upon by the Tribunal treated the quantum of waste as immaterial where the waste arose during manufacture of BOPP film. The fact that the waste was cleared at nil rate of duty did not alter the availability of credit on the inputs used in the manufacturing process.
Conclusion: The benefit of Rule 57D was held admissible irrespective of the quantum of waste, in favour of the assessee.
Issue (ii): Whether the questions proposed in the reference application arose out of the impugned order.
Analysis: After examining the impugned order, the Tribunal found that the reference application did not raise any question of law arising from that order because the controversy had already been concluded on the admissibility of credit under Rule 57D irrespective of the quantity of waste. As a result, the proposed reference did not satisfy the requirement that the questions arise from the impugned order.
Conclusion: The proposed questions of law were held not to arise out of the impugned order, against the Revenue.
Final Conclusion: The tribunal's reasoning affirmed availability of Modvat credit on waste-related inputs without regard to the quantum of waste, and the reference proceedings ended because no referable question of law was found to arise from the impugned order.
Ratio Decidendi: Where waste, refuse or by-product arises in manufacture, Modvat credit on the inputs is not denied merely because the quantum of waste is high, and a reference lies only if the proposed question of law arises from the impugned order.
TaxTMI 
