Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether interest was payable on excise duty deposited in instalments without permission and whether the refund claim of the interest paid under protest was liable to be rejected.
Analysis: The duty demand for the relevant period had been confirmed, and the assessee chose to discharge the liability in 30 instalments on its own instead of making lump-sum payment. Interest at 17.5% on the delayed payment was demanded under the Central Board of Excise and Customs Circular No. 182/85 (Misc. 44/85). The decision relied upon by the assessee was held inapplicable because, in that case, instalment payment had been permitted without any interest condition, whereas here the delay was caused by the assessee without such permission. On these facts, the demand of interest was treated as justified and no infirmity was found in the rejection of refund.
Conclusion: Interest on the delayed payment of duty was rightly demanded and the refund claim was not maintainable.
Ratio Decidendi: Where excise duty is paid in instalments without permission and delay is attributable to the assessee, interest may be validly recovered and a refund claim against such recovery fails.