TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether Modvat credit on indigenous inputs used in the manufacture of soaps exported under bond could be denied merely because the export was made under the DEEC Scheme and advance licence/replenishment benefits were claimed. (ii) Whether phosphoric acid used for purification was an eligible input for Modvat credit. (iii) Whether Modvat credit on caustic soda lye was admissible in the absence of duty-paying documents.
Issue (i): Whether Modvat credit on indigenous inputs used in the manufacture of soaps exported under bond could be denied merely because the export was made under the DEEC Scheme and advance licence/replenishment benefits were claimed.
Analysis: The inputs and final products were specified under Rule 57A and the requisite declaration had been filed under Rule 57G. Rule 57F(3)(a) permitted export of final products under bond where Modvat credit had been taken on the inputs. The subsequent question of replenishment imports under the export policy was held to be distinct from the export of the goods themselves and could not be read into the Modvat scheme to deny credit.
Conclusion: Modvat credit on the inputs used in the exported goods under bond was rightly allowed and the denial on this ground was not sustainable.
Issue (ii): Whether phosphoric acid used for purification was an eligible input for Modvat credit.
Analysis: Phosphoric acid was used in the purification process and was therefore used in or in relation to the manufacture of soap. On that basis, it qualified as an input for Modvat purposes.
Conclusion: Modvat credit on phosphoric acid was correctly allowed.
Issue (iii): Whether Modvat credit on caustic soda lye was admissible in the absence of duty-paying documents.
Analysis: The record showed that no duty-paying document had been produced for caustic soda lye. In the absence of proof of duty payment, the claim for credit could not be sustained.
Conclusion: Modvat credit on caustic soda lye was rightly denied.
Final Conclusion: The appeal was disposed of by sustaining the allowance of Modvat credit on the exported inputs and phosphoric acid, while upholding denial of credit on caustic soda lye.
Ratio Decidendi: Export of final products under bond does not by itself bar Modvat credit on eligible inputs merely because replenishment benefits are also claimed under the export policy, but credit remains admissible only where the input is used in or in relation to manufacture and supporting duty-paid documents exist.
TaxTMI 
