Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the credit of duty paid on inputs used in the manufacture of goods exported under bond, where the export was linked to replenishment materials under the advance licence scheme, was recoverable or disallowable under the Central Excise Rules, 1944.
Analysis: The issue turned on the distinction between Modvat credit under the Central Excise Rules and customs duty liability under the Customs Act. The notification governing the replenishment scheme did not incorporate the Modvat provisions so as to deny credit merely because the resultant products were exported under bond. The earlier view taken by the Tribunal on the applicability of Rule 57F(3) was found to be correct, and no contrary point of law was shown to arise.
Conclusion: The credit was not held to be inadmissible on the stated ground, and the reference application failed.