Refund limitation and protest letter treatment determine whether exemption-based refund claims can be reconsidered.

A refund application filed nearly three years after the relevant clearances was not a valid refund claim for the earlier period because the letter dated 3-10-1985 did not identify the quantity of goods or the refund period sought. The letter was therefore not comparable to the refund applications accepted in the cited precedents. However, the surrounding facts, including gate pass endorsements and the intention to clear goods under exemption, supported treating the same letter as a protest for clearances made after that date. The exemption conditions and refund entitlement for the later clearances were remanded for fresh reconsideration in accordance with law.

---

---

Issues: Whether the refund claim was barred by limitation, whether the letter dated 3-10-1985 could be treated as a refund claim or protest for the later clearances, and whether the matter required reconsideration by the department.

Analysis: The formal refund application was filed nearly three years after the relevant clearances, so the claim could not be accepted as a refund claim for the earlier period on the basis of the letter dated 3-10-1985, which did not specify the quantity of goods or the period for which refund was sought. The letter was also not analogous to the letters treated as refund applications in the cited precedents. However, the surrounding facts, including endorsements on gate passes and the appellant's intention to clear goods under exemption, supported treating the letter as a protest for clearances made after that date. The question whether the conditions for exemption were substantially satisfied therefore required reconsideration.

Conclusion: The letter dated 3-10-1985 was not accepted as a refund claim for the earlier period, but it could be treated as a protest for subsequent clearances, and the refund issue was remanded for fresh decision in accordance with law.

---