Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the impugned weld trainer was classifiable under Heading 90.21 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 as instruments, apparatus or models designed solely for demonstrational purposes and unsuitable for other uses, or under Heading 85.18/27(1).
Analysis: The literature and technical material showed that the equipment was a welding simulator used exclusively for training and demonstration of welding skills. The certificate of the Chartered Engineer also stated that it was kept in the welding training centre and could not be used as a full-fledged welding machine. In a classification dispute, the burden was on the Revenue to establish that the goods were capable of other use, but no rebuttal evidence was produced. The record therefore supported the claim that the goods were designed solely for demonstrational purposes and were unsuitable for other uses.
Conclusion: The goods were correctly classifiable under Heading 90.21 and not under Heading 85.18/27(1), and the assessee succeeded.