Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, under Rule 57K read with Notification No. 45/89-C.E. (N.T.) dated 11-10-1989, money credit on specified minor oils was admissible on the quantity of raw oil taken for processing or only on the quantity of oil actually subjected to hydrogenation.
Analysis: The notification, issued under Rule 57K of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, specifies the inputs and also limits the credit to the quantity of oil or fat subjected to hydrogenation, blending, or emulsification, as the case may be. The credit scheme could therefore be confined by the terms of the notification even if the main rule speaks generally of raw materials used in manufacture. The machinery provisions in the notification were treated as validly fixing the extent of the concession, and the notification was construed in a manner consistent with its purpose and with the earlier Tribunal view on the same issue.
Conclusion: Credit was admissible only on the quantity of oil actually subjected to hydrogenation and not on the full quantity of raw oil taken into processing. The appeals failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a credit scheme is granted by notification under a enabling rule, the extent of credit is controlled by the notification's express conditions, and the concession may be limited to the quantity actually brought to the notified process stage.