Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether aluminium sulphate used in the treatment of spent lye for obtaining crude glycerine was an eligible input for proforma credit under Notification No. 201/79, and whether such input had to form part of the finished product.
Analysis: The input was used in the manufacturing process to remove impurities from spent lye and to make crude glycerine possible. The deciding test was not physical presence in the final product, but whether the final product could emerge without the intervention of the input. An input that directly participates in and is indispensable to the manufacturing stream is not disqualified merely because it does not remain in the finished goods.
Conclusion: The input was held to have entered the stream of manufacture and the denial of proforma credit was unsustainable.