Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, on the admitted facts, the Tribunal's order gave rise to any question of law requiring reference to the High Court under Section 35G of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, particularly on the assessee's entitlement to Modvat credit where the input declarations were defective or incorrect.
Analysis: The statutory scheme under Rule 57G required a manufacturer to file a declaration of the final products and intended inputs before taking credit under Rule 57A. On the facts recorded, declarations had in fact been filed, though the inputs were described with incorrect sub-headings and were later corrected by a revised declaration. The dispute, therefore, was not one of complete absence of declaration but of misdescription and later rectification. The Tribunal's finding that mere non-mention of the inputs, without a finding that the inputs were not received, were not duty paid, or were not used in manufacture, did not justify reversal of Modvat credit, was treated as a factual determination. The record did not disclose a pure question of law arising from the Tribunal's order, and the reference sought by Revenue was held unnecessary.
Conclusion: No question of law arose for reference under Section 35G, and the Revenue's reference application failed.