Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether soap noodles cleared in noodle form were "soap for toilet use" under Notification No. 12/93-C.E. and therefore liable to duty at 20% ad valorem, or whether they fell under the residuary description of other soaps attracting 5% ad valorem.
Analysis: The relevant point for classification was the condition of the goods at the time of presentation for assessment. Although the noodles were intended to undergo further processing and would ultimately become toilet soap, the goods as cleared were not themselves toilet soap or soap for toilet use. The notification distinguished between soap for toilet use and other soaps, and the goods in noodle form, requiring further processing before becoming toilet soap, did not answer the description of soap for toilet use.
Conclusion: The goods were not classifiable as soap for toilet use and were liable only to duty at 5% ad valorem; the demand and penalty were set aside in favour of the assessee.