Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether pre-deposit of duty should be dispensed with pending appeal where Modvat credit on capital goods was taken on receipt of the goods but utilised before installation.
Analysis: The relevant rules were unamended when the credit was taken, and Rule 57Q was read as permitting credit on receipt of capital goods in the factory, while restricting utilisation until the goods were put to use. The later notification was treated as prima facie clarificatory. The Modvat scheme, intended to avoid cascading duty, was held to support the view that credit in respect of capital goods having long life became available only when the goods were installed and put to use, making the lower authority's interpretation prima facie correct. As the machinery had since been installed and the credit had become available, the balance of convenience favoured dispensing with pre-deposit during the pendency of the appeal.
Conclusion: Dispensation of pre-deposit of duty was granted in favour of the assessee pending appeal.