Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether beaded tape imported for use in zipper manufacture fell within S. No. 2 of Notification No. 190/90 as "zip tape", or within S. No. 4 so as to entitle the importer to the benefit claimed.
Analysis: The entry "zip tape" was not defined in the notification. The imported goods were tape intended for use in zip fasteners, and the record did not establish that the expression was confined only to tape already fitted with teeth. In the absence of a restrictive definition, the expression was treated as a broad and comprehensive description covering both tape fitted with teeth and tape imported for that purpose.
Conclusion: The goods fell within S. No. 2 of the notification, not S. No. 4, and the revenue's appeal succeeded.
Final Conclusion: The importer was held not entitled to the lower authority's classification benefit, and the revenue obtained the relief sought by setting aside the order under challenge.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a notification uses an undefined commercial expression, it is construed in its comprehensive sense unless the text of the notification shows a narrower intended meaning.