Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalties levied under section 273(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 could be sustained for defaults relating to the assessment years 1958-59 and 1959-60 under section 18A(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1922.
Analysis: The question turned on the transitional effect of section 297(2)(g) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court held that, in view of the Supreme Court's ruling that section 297(2)(g) applies to defaults under section 18A of the repealed 1922 Act, section 273 of the 1961 Act is attracted to such cases. The assessee's further contention that the provision could apply only where the assessment was completed on or after 1 April 1962 was not decided, because that point did not arise from the Tribunal's appellate order and had not been adjudicated by it.
Conclusion: The question referred was answered in the negative, and the cancellation of penalties was not justified.
Final Conclusion: The reference was decided against the assessee on the applicability of the 1961 penalty provision to a default under the repealed 1922 Act.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the transitional provision so provides, a default committed under the repealed Income-tax Act, 1922 may attract the corresponding penalty provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961.