Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether polystyrene co-polymer beads were classifiable under sub-heading 3903.10 as polystyrene, or under sub-heading 3903.90 as an other/residuary polymer.
Analysis: Chapter Note 4 to Chapter 39 requires copolymers and polymer blends to be classified under the heading covering the comonomer that predominates by weight over every other single comonomer, and comonomers whose polymers fall in the same heading are treated as a single comonomer. The product was found, on the factual record, to have styrene as the predominant monomer by weight, and no technical material was produced to dislodge that position. The residuary sub-heading 3903.90 could be invoked only if the product did not fall under any of the preceding sub-headings.
Conclusion: The goods were correctly classifiable as polystyrene under sub-heading 3903.10, and not under sub-heading 3903.90.
Final Conclusion: The Revenue's challenge to the classification failed, and the assessee's classification was sustained with the consequential duty position under the notified heading.
Ratio Decidendi: For copolymers and polymer blends, classification follows the predominant comonomer by weight where the relevant chapter note so provides, and a residuary entry cannot be used when the goods are covered by a specific sub-heading.