Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the scrap arising in the course of manufacture of metal containers was classifiable under Chapter Heading 7212.90 or Chapter Heading 7203.20.
Analysis: The scrap was generated during manufacture from steel sheets used as inputs for making metal containers and was admittedly dutiable. The Department relied on a presumption that the scrap was capable of use otherwise than melting, but no material was produced to show its dimensions, width, or any actual non-melting use by purchasers. In the absence of evidence, the burden to justify classification under the heading for material capable of other use was not discharged.
Conclusion: The scrap was classifiable as waste and scrap of steel under Chapter Heading 7203.20, and classification under Chapter Heading 7212.90 was not sustainable. The appeal was allowed with consequential relief.