Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether polythene film used to cover aerated water bottles in a take-away pack was an eligible input or packing material for availment of Modvat credit under Rule 57A.
Analysis: The polythene film was used only after the aerated water bottles had already been manufactured and entered in the RG-1 register. The bottles were complete goods before being placed in the take-away tray, and the material was used only to cover the pack for transport. Since the bottle was the relevant packing element for the aerated water and the film was not used in or in relation to manufacture of the final product, it did not answer the description of an input under Rule 57A. The cited authorities were held to be inapplicable on the facts.
Conclusion: The polythene film was not an input or packing material eligible for Modvat credit under Rule 57A, and the claim failed.