Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit could be taken on the strength of endorsed bills of entry not standing in the manufacturer's name.
Analysis: The imported goods were traceable to the appellant through the endorsements on the triplicate bills of entry, which established the link between the imported consignments and the goods received in the factory for use in manufacture. Rule 57-G of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 recognized bills of entry as valid documents for availing Modvat credit, and the later amendment specifically referring to the triplicate copy was treated as clarificatory. An endorsed bill of entry did not cease to be a duty paying document merely because it was endorsed by the importer in favour of the manufacturer.
Conclusion: Modvat credit on endorsed bills of entry was admissible, and the rejection of credit was unsustainable.
Final Conclusion: The appellant was entitled to avail Modvat credit on the endorsed bills of entry and the impugned denial was set aside.
Ratio Decidendi: An endorsed bill of entry continues to be a valid duty paying document for Modvat purposes where it establishes the link between the imported goods and their receipt by the manufacturer for use in production.