Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the applicant was entitled to the concession under Notification No. 8/2003-CE despite the proposed foreign equity in the joint venture exceeding 25% and the applicant ceasing to be a small scale industrial unit. (ii) Whether, on import of machinery, the applicant could claim CVD and SAD credit immediately or accumulate such credit until clearances reached Rs. 100 lakhs.
Issue (i): Entitlement to the exemption had to be examined on the terms of the notification as amended, which granted relief to specified clearances subject to the stated conditions. The foreign equity structure and the loss of SSI status did not disqualify the applicant where the notification itself governed eligibility and no contrary condition was shown to apply.
Conclusion: The applicant remained entitled to the concession under Notification No. 8/2003-CE as amended, notwithstanding the proposed foreign equity and the cessation of SSI status.
Issue (ii): The exemption under the notification was conditioned on the manufacturer not utilising credit of duty on capital goods under Rule 3 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 for payment of duty on the initial clearances up to Rs. 100 lakhs. Reading the notification with Rule 3 showed that the credit of CVD and SAD on imported machinery could not be used until the exempted clearance threshold was exhausted and duty became payable on production clearances.
Conclusion: The applicant could not utilise CVD and SAD credit on the imported machinery until the exemption limit of Rs. 100 lakhs was exhausted.
Final Conclusion: The ruling answered both questions in the applicant's favour on eligibility for the exemption, while holding that CVD and SAD credit could be taken only after the exempted clearance threshold was crossed and excise duty became payable.
Ratio Decidendi: A conditional exemption notification must be construed with the credit rules governing capital goods, and credit on imported machinery cannot be utilised for payment of duty on exempt clearances where the notification itself makes such non-utilisation a condition of the exemption.