Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether stay and waiver of the duty demand on CTD bars should be granted in view of the Departmental verification covering the amount of duty demanded and the Tribunal's earlier approach in similar matters.
Analysis: The Tribunal noted that in earlier stay applications involving similar facts, stay had been granted where the Modvat eligibility of the inputs used in manufacture was verified and the verification report covered the full amount of duty demanded. It followed its prior identical orders and treated the Departmental verification as sufficient to justify interim protection. The goods were also stated to be claimed as ineligible for exemption under Notification No. 202/88, but the immediate question was confined to waiver of the duty demand at the stay stage.
Conclusion: Stay of the duty demand was granted in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: Interim relief was allowed on the basis of prior Tribunal practice and verification of the duty amount, and the matter was posted for further hearing along with connected cases.
Ratio Decidendi: In stay proceedings involving duty demand, where departmental verification covers the full amount demanded and prior identical orders support the same approach, interim waiver may be granted.