Clubbing of clearances fails where separate partnership firms lack proof of financial interdependence and flow-back of funds.

Clearances of separate partnership firms could not be clubbed for central excise where each unit had independent registrations and SSI recognition, and the Department failed to prove common funding, financial interdependence or flow-back of profits. Common partners, premises, workers or machinery were insufficient by themselves to treat the firms as one manufacturer absent evidence of common financial control and domination. On that basis, each unit remained separately entitled to exemption under the relevant notification, and the demand founded on clubbing, together with the consequential penalty, was held unsustainable.

---

---

Issues: Whether the clearances of two partnership firms could be clubbed for central excise purposes and whether penalty was leviable.

Analysis: The units were separate partnership concerns with independent registrations under income tax, sales tax and excise, and both were recognised as SSI units. The decisive factor was whether there was a common source of funds, flow-back of profits or monetary interdependence showing that one concern was only a facade for the other. The evidence did not establish that either unit financed the other, nor was there proof of flow-back of sale proceeds or profits. Common partners, common premises, common workers or shared machinery by themselves were held insufficient to treat the concerns as one manufacturer in the absence of proof of common financial control and domination.

Conclusion: The clearances of the two partnership firms could not be clubbed and each unit was entitled separately to the exemption under the relevant notification.

Final Conclusion: The demand based on clubbing of clearances and the consequential penalty were unsustainable, and the appeals succeeded.

Ratio Decidendi: Clubbing of clearances of separate partnership firms is not justified unless the Department proves common funding, financial interdependence or flow-back of funds showing that the units are not independent manufacturers.

---