Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether endorsed gate passes issued on or before 30-3-1994 could be treated as valid documents for availment of Modvat credit where the endorsement was made after that date but before 30-6-1994.
Analysis: Notification No. 16/94 (N.T.) made endorsed gate passes one of the authorised documents and its proviso required the document to have been issued before 1-4-1994 and credit to have been taken on or before 30-6-1994. The gate passes in question were admittedly issued before 30-3-1994. The subsequent endorsement did not amount to a fresh issue of the gate pass, but only recorded transfer of the goods already covered by that document. The later requirement regarding dealer registration and invoice under Notification No. 32/94 could not defeat credit for the interregnum where the original gate pass had already been issued within time and the credit was taken within the prescribed period.
Conclusion: The endorsed gate passes were valid for Modvat credit and the disallowance was unsustainable.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded and the order denying Modvat credit was set aside.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the original document is issued within the stipulated period, a later endorsement merely transferring the goods does not amount to a fresh issuance so as to invalidate credit otherwise taken within the prescribed time.