TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Validity of Endorsed Gate-pass for Modvat credit clarified by High Court</h1> <h3>COMMISSIONER OF C. EX., INDORE Versus SHREE SYNTHETICS</h3> COMMISSIONER OF C. EX., INDORE Versus SHREE SYNTHETICS - 2007 (207) E.L.T. 341 (M. P.) Issues:1. Interpretation of the validity of Endorsed Gate-pass for availing Modvat credit under Notification 16/94-CE(NT) dated 30-3-94.2. Authority of CEGAT to consider non-prescribed documents as valid duty paying documents.Analysis:Issue 1:The High Court was tasked with determining the validity of an Endorsed Gate-pass issued after 1-4-94 for availing Modvat credit under Notification 16/94-CE(NT) dated 30-3-94. The Tribunal had previously allowed Modvat Credit on gate-passes issued before 1-4-1994 but endorsed later, citing precedents. The Modvat Scheme, introduced in 1986, allowed credit for duty paid on excisable goods used in manufacturing. Rule 57G outlined the procedure for claiming such credit, with the Ministry issuing instructions on prescribed documents. The proviso to Rule 57G was amended on 1-3-1994, requiring such prescriptions by Notification. Notification No. 16/94-C.E. (N.T.) listed documents for credit under Rule 57G, specifying issuance before 1-4-1994 and credit taken by 30-6-1994. The Court held that the gate-pass and endorsement must both be issued before 1-4-1994 for credit by 30-6-1994, as per the plain language of the Notification. Therefore, the Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, requiring both issuance and endorsement before 1-4-1994 for availing credit.Issue 2:The second issue involved the authority of CEGAT to consider documents not prescribed under Rule 57G as valid duty paying documents. The Court's interpretation of the Notification and Rule 57G emphasized the strict requirement of issuance and endorsement before 1-4-1994 for credit by 30-6-1994. By aligning with the Notification's language, the Court upheld the concurrent necessity of both conditions being met before the specified dates. Consequently, the Court ruled against the respondent, affirming the requirement that gate passes and endorsements must precede 1-4-1994 to avail Modvat credit by 30-6-1994.
TaxTMI 