Strict construction of fiscal notifications bars Modvat credit on endorsed gate passes issued after the cut-off date.

A fiscal notification allowing Modvat credit was strictly construed to limit eligibility to gate passes issued before 1-4-1994, with credit also required to be taken by 30-6-1994. The court treated both the document issue date and the credit-taking deadline as mandatory concurrent conditions, and held that an endorsement could not expand the prescribed class of valid duty-paying documents to include gate passes issued after the cut-off date. Accordingly, an endorsed gate pass issued after 1-4-1994 was not a valid basis for Modvat credit.

---

---

Issues: Whether an endorsed gate pass issued after 1-4-1994 could be treated as a valid document for availment of Modvat credit under the relevant notification, and whether the prescribed authorities could treat an unnotified document as a valid duty paying document.

Analysis: The notification prescribed only those documents that had been issued before 1-4-1994 and further required that credit be taken on or before 30-6-1994. The wording was held to be plain and unambiguous. On that construction, the benefit was confined to gate passes issued before 1-4-1994, and the endorsement also had to exist before that date. The facility of endorsement could not extend the prescribed category to documents issued after the cut-off date. As the notification had to be strictly construed, both conditions were treated as concurrent and mandatory.

Conclusion: An endorsed gate pass issued after 1-4-1994 was not a valid document for availing Modvat credit, and the questions were answered in favour of the Revenue and against the assessee.

Ratio Decidendi: A fiscal notification granting credit must be strictly construed, and where it prescribes both the issue date of the document and the date by which credit may be taken, both conditions must be satisfied exactly as stipulated.

---