Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellants were entitled to refund of duty paid on import clearance under the DEEC scheme after amendment of the import licence deleting the individual item value restriction.
Analysis: The import of the goods was within the quantity restriction under the DEEC licence, and the excess value arose only because of exchange-rate fluctuation and delay in supply. The amendment to the licence was made on the appellants' request to permit the import of 60 kgs. of material, and the insistence on a further endorsement to the amendment was found unjustified. It was also accepted that the imported goods had been used only in the manufacture of export goods and that no drawback had been availed in respect of the duty paid.
Conclusion: The appellants were entitled to refund of the duty paid, with consequential relief.
Final Conclusion: The duty liability was held refundable in view of the amended licence, the export-oriented use of the goods, and the absence of any drawback benefit.
Ratio Decidendi: Where imported goods are cleared under the DEEC scheme within the permitted quantity and the value excess arises only from exchange-rate fluctuation, a bona fide licence amendment deleting the value restriction can justify refund of the duty paid if the goods are used for export manufacture and no drawback is claimed.