Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the revenue could require reversal of MODVAT credit on inputs, finished goods and scrap remaining in the factory when the assessee commenced clearances under Notification No. 1/93.
Analysis: The assessee had already discharged duty on the goods at the applicable rate before availing the exemption under Notification No. 1/93. The unutilised inputs, scrap and stampings had been cleared on payment of duty or reversed where appropriate before the assessee began clearances under the notification. At that point, no inputs on which MODVAT credit had been taken were lying as such, and no non-duty-paid goods remained in the factory. Rule 57F(1)(i) was therefore not attracted. The notification also did not require the benefit to be treated as operative from the first day of the financial year merely because clearances later fell within the exemption limit.
Conclusion: Reversal of MODVAT credit was not required and the revenue's appeal failed.