Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether issue of a show cause notice before repeal of the Gold (Control) Act, 1968 constituted commencement of proceedings for the purpose of Section 6 of the General Clauses Act, 1897 and whether the question of law arising from the Tribunal's order merited reference under Section 82B of the Gold (Control) Act, 1968.
Analysis: The show cause notice had been issued before the repeal of the Act and the department asserted that it was served on the date of repeal. In that factual setting, the question whether proceedings had been instituted and were capable of continuing under the savings clause in Section 6 of the General Clauses Act, 1897 was a substantial question of law. The existence of a legal issue affecting continuance of proceedings justified reference to the High Court.
Conclusion: The question of law was held to merit reference in favour of the Revenue.
Final Conclusion: The reference application succeeded and the connected cross objection did not survive.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a show cause notice is issued before repeal and the effect of repeal on pending proceedings is in issue, the matter raises a referable question of law under the savings provision.