Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the order dated 13-4-1992 rejecting the Department's miscellaneous application was a valid order in law.
Analysis: The order sheet entry of 13-4-1992 recorded that the application was rejected, but it also stated that a detailed order would follow. The subsequent record showed that the matter continued to be treated as part-heard and was heard again on merits on later dates. The Tribunal examined the note-sheet entries, the order-sheet entries and the requirement that a judicial decision must be the formal and operative pronouncement of the Court or Tribunal. It held that a judgment or order becomes final only when it is validly delivered and completed by the members constituting the Bench, and that an unsigned or incomplete draft or note cannot by itself confer finality.
Conclusion: The order dated 13-4-1992 was not a valid order in the eyes of law. The Department's application for rehearing was therefore accepted and the matter was directed to be heard on merits.
Final Conclusion: The Tribunal treated the earlier rejection entry as legally ineffective and restored the Department's challenge for fresh hearing on merits.
Ratio Decidendi: A judicial order attains legal validity and finality only when it is formally and effectively pronounced as the operative decision of the Bench; a mere note-sheet or incomplete entry, without a complete judicial act by the Bench as constituted, does not constitute a valid order.