Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessable value of the imported car was correctly determined on the basis of the manufacturer's price catalogue and whether the appellant's invoice and subsequent certificate could be accepted as the basis of valuation.
Analysis: The invoice produced by the appellant was found not to represent the true and real value, as it reflected a special diplomatic price not available generally. The certificate obtained later was held to be unreliable because it did not correlate with the imported car's description and the date and engine details did not match. In the absence of a genuine invoice, the price catalogue issued by the manufacturer to its authorised local agents was accepted as a proper basis for valuation, consistent with valuation under Section 14 of the Customs Act, 1962 and Rule 3A of the Valuation Rules.
Conclusion: The assessable value was validly determined on the basis of the manufacturer's price catalogue, and the appellant's challenge to the valuation failed.