Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the assessable value of the imported cars was correctly taken on the basis of the manufacturer's invoice with addition of freight, insurance and landing charges; (ii) Whether the claimed 15% discount could be allowed in valuation; (iii) Whether the air-conditioner and radio-stereo fitted in the cars were liable to be assessed along with the car or on separate headings; (iv) Whether depreciation from the date of shipment to the date of delivery was allowable.
Issue (i): Whether the assessable value of the imported cars was correctly taken on the basis of the manufacturer's invoice with addition of freight, insurance and landing charges.
Analysis: Imported goods are to be valued under the Customs Act, and Section 14 governs the determination of value at the time and place of importation. The price relevant for assessment is the price at which the goods are delivered at the point of landing in India, not the price at which the transaction took place abroad. A reference to Section 4 of the Central Excises and Salt Act is irrelevant to imported goods. Accordingly, freight, insurance and landing charges were rightly included.
Conclusion: The valuation on this count was correct and is in favour of the Revenue.
Issue (ii): Whether the claimed 15% discount could be allowed in valuation.
Analysis: The assessment was based on the manufacturer's invoice produced by the importer himself, and the invoice did not indicate any trade discount. It also contained a certificate that the declared value was true and correct. In the presence of this unimpeachable document, there was no basis to adopt catalogue price, price-list value, or any other alternative figure. The authorities were justified in relying on the invoice value as the true amount paid.
Conclusion: The claim for 15% discount was rightly rejected and is against the assessee.
Issue (iii): Whether the air-conditioner and radio-stereo fitted in the cars were liable to be assessed along with the car or on separate headings.
Analysis: Where goods consist of a set of articles and separate values are available, separate assessment at different rates is permissible. The invoice disclosed separate values for the items, bringing the case within the statutory scheme for separate charging. The request to treat the accessories as part of a single assessable unit with the car could not be accepted.
Conclusion: Separate assessment of the accessories was valid and is in favour of the Revenue.
Issue (iv): Whether depreciation from the date of shipment to the date of delivery was allowable.
Analysis: No rule or legal provision was shown to support a depreciation allowance on the facts. Transit time on a ship cannot be treated as period of use for depreciation purposes, and no entitlement to reduction in value was established.
Conclusion: The claim for depreciation was rightly rejected and is against the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The valuation adopted by the customs authorities was upheld in all material respects, and the appeals failed in their entirety.
Ratio Decidendi: For customs assessment, the invoice produced by the importer may be accepted as the true transaction value where it is unimpeached, and freight, insurance, and landing charges are includible in the assessable value determined at the place of importation.