Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the applicants were entitled to total waiver of pre-deposit in a stay application concerning excise duty on auto rickshaws, and whether the manufacturing process adopted by them brought the goods within the scope of the concessional exemption notification applicable to manufacturers who do not take credit on chassis or inputs.
Analysis: The Tribunal examined the tariff scheme for motor vehicles and chassis and held that chassis fitted with engines are separately dutiable, while vehicles falling under the relevant auto rickshaw headings attract duty on the final product. It noted that the concessional notification was intended for manufacturers who obtain chassis from outside and do not avail credit under the relevant excise rules. On the facts, the Tribunal found prima facie that the applicants' process still resulted in a chassis coming into existence and that merely altering the sequence of operations and fitting the engine at a later stage did not justify the lower concessional rate. The Tribunal also found that no balance sheet or comparable material had been produced to establish financial hardship sufficient for total waiver.
Conclusion: Total waiver of pre-deposit was rejected. The applicants were directed to pre-deposit Rs. 25,00,000 and the balance duty was dispensed with pending appeal.